Benutser Diskussion:CommonsDelinker
Gouden Dai :)
Uur dät Wächmoakjen fon Bielden sunner Bescheed tou tällen
[beoarbaidje Wältext]Moin, CommonsDelinker! Iek kon nu ferstounde, wät du aaltiede moakest. Man dät rakt Bielden, doo gjucht wichtich sunt foar n Artikkel. In grattere Wikipedien koast du dät so moakje, eenfach Bielden wäch moakje, sunner wät tou kweeden. Deer wäd älken Artikkel so oafte besäiked, dät aan dät Failjen fon ne Bielde sjucht un ne näie säike kon. Man in litje Wikipedien gungt dät nit. Deer is dät nit so, dät deer ap älken Artikkel 100 Ljuude an n Dai kiekje. Deer moast du Bescheed tälle (in uus Weerskup), af die Artikkel is uunfulständich un naan sjucht dät.
Supposing that you are one of those Users, who don't speak Saterlandic, but all the same work in our Wikipedia, I repeat the whole thing in English for you:
Hello, CommonsDelinker! Now I can understand, what you are doing all the time. But there are images, which are very importaint foar an article. In bigger wikipedias you can act that way and remove images without saying anything. Every article there is visited so often, that someone sees, that there is an image missing, and searches for a new one. But in the small wikipedias, this isn't a good way to act. There, the articles are not visited that often, and there are not 100 people a day who visit every article. There, you have to tell us (in our Pub), otherwise the article is incomplete and noone will recognize it.
--Heinz 07:08, 22. Moa 2009 (UTC)
- That's a strange argument, you are not only blocking the unlinking function but also the image replacing function of Commons Delinker. Also there's always the option to check the user contributions to find articles with removed images. --Denniss (Diskussion) 23:27, 22. Jan 2014 (UTC)